SCHEMBL813342

SCHEMBL813342

CC(=O)C=C[C@@H]1[C@@H](C)CCCC1(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 3)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTPN2 P17706 1/20 0.43
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.43
UGT2B7 P16662 4/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL813343 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL1583053 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL10971244 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL9617991 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL813344 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL813341 1.00 PTPN2 (0.43) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL954543 0.86 UGT2B7 (0.52) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL9248576 0.86 UGT2B7 (0.52) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL954950 0.86 UGT2B7 (0.52) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7
SCHEMBL954542 0.86 UGT2B7 (0.52) PTPN2PTPN1UGT2B7

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8067644-B2 Process for conducting an organic reaction in ionic liquids THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2011-11-29 US claimed
EP-2370387-A2 PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING AN ORGANIC REACTION IN IONIC LIQUIDS The Procter & Gamble Company (US) 2011-10-05 EP claimed
US-20110152566-A1 Process for Conducting an Organic Reaction in Ionic Liquids THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2011-06-23 US claimed
WO-2010080505-A2 PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING AN ORGANIC REACTION IN IONIC LIQUIDS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2010-07-15 WO claimed
US-8067644-B2 Process for conducting an organic reaction in ionic liquids THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2011-11-29 US disclosed
EP-2370387-A2 PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING AN ORGANIC REACTION IN IONIC LIQUIDS The Procter & Gamble Company (US) 2011-10-05 EP disclosed
US-20110152566-A1 Process for Conducting an Organic Reaction in Ionic Liquids THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2011-06-23 US disclosed
WO-2010080505-A2 PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING AN ORGANIC REACTION IN IONIC LIQUIDS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2010-07-15 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110152566-A1 Process for Conducting an Organic Reaction in Ionic Liquids ACSL3, ACSL1, MCOLN1 PTPN2 4818/4885PTPN1 4786/4885UGT2B7 3861/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.