SCHEMBL10195209

SCHEMBL10195209

CCc1ccc(Oc2nc3ccccc3s2)cc1C1=C(O)C(C)(C)OC(C)(C)C1=O

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.42
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.42
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.42
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.42
LTA4H P09960 15/20 0.41
EPHX2 P34913 5/20 0.41
CTSD P07339 1/20 0.39
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.36
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10192940 0.94 CYP1A2 (0.43) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL10195363 0.89 NPC1 (0.38) SMN1; SMN2EPHX2PPARA
SCHEMBL10195291 0.89 EPHX2 (0.34) CYP2C19SMN1; SMN2LTA4HEPHX2
SCHEMBL10195359 0.89 ATAD2 (0.38) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL10195386 0.88 CTSD (0.34) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL10195210 0.88 KMT2A (0.35) LTA4HEPHX2CTSDPPARGPPARA
SCHEMBL10195356 0.88 EPHX2 (0.33) SMN1; SMN2LTA4HEPHX2CTSD
SCHEMBL10195365 0.86 DYRK1A (0.39) CYP1A2CYP3A4SMN1; SMN2EPHX2CTSD
SCHEMBL16351646 0.86 KMT2A (0.39) CYP3A4SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL10195366 0.86 EPHX2 (0.45) CYP2D6EPHX2PPARA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2387569-B1 HERBCIDES SYNGENTA LTD (GB) 2016-06-15 EP disclosed
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-12-25 US disclosed
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-12-25 US disclosed
US-8865623-B2 Herbicidally active cyclic diones and derivatives thereof, processes for their preparation, compositions, and method of controlling weeds SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-10-21 US disclosed
US-8865623-B2 Herbicidally active cyclic diones and derivatives thereof, processes for their preparation, compositions, and method of controlling weeds SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-10-21 US disclosed
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
WO-2010081755-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2010-07-22 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES DDT, CYP4X1, CYP1B1 CYP1A2 11/4885CYP3A4 61/4885CYP2D6 17/4885
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES DDT, CYP4X1, CYP1B1 CYP1A2 67/4885CYP3A4 424/4885CYP2D6 88/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.