SCHEMBL10195472

SCHEMBL10195472

CCc1ccc(Oc2ncc(C(F)(F)F)cc2Cl)cc1C1=C(O)CC2(CCOCC2)CC1=O

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 6/20 0.43
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.42
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.41
LIPE Q05469 1/20 0.39
PPARG P37231 3/20 0.38
HTT P42858 3/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.37
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.37
POLB P06746 1/20 0.37
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16180995 0.94 RAB9A (0.38) RAB9ALMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL10195469 0.91 SCN9A (0.35) RAB9ALMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL10195473 0.91 SCN9A (0.36) RAB9ALMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL10195476 0.89 LIPE (0.42) LMNASMN1; SMN2LIPEPPARG
SCHEMBL10195467 0.87 LIPE (0.33) LIPE
SCHEMBL10195191 0.87 RAB9A (0.47) RAB9ALMNASMN1; SMN2FFAR1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL16180993 0.87 SCN9A (0.33)
SCHEMBL10195465 0.86 SCN9A (0.47) LIPE
SCHEMBL10195471 0.86 FFAR1 (0.39) FFAR1PPARGMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL10195475 0.85 DRD1 (0.35) LIPEPPARG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2387569-B1 HERBCIDES SYNGENTA LTD (GB) 2016-06-15 EP disclosed
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-12-25 US disclosed
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-12-25 US disclosed
US-8865623-B2 Herbicidally active cyclic diones and derivatives thereof, processes for their preparation, compositions, and method of controlling weeds SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-10-21 US disclosed
US-8865623-B2 Herbicidally active cyclic diones and derivatives thereof, processes for their preparation, compositions, and method of controlling weeds SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2014-10-21 US disclosed
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) 2012-01-26 US disclosed
WO-2010081755-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES SYNGENTA LIMITED (GB) 2010-07-22 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20140378305-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES DDT, CYP4X1, CYP1B1 RAB9A 2665/4885LMNA 4151/4885SMN1; SMN2 2218/4885
US-20120021907-A1 NOVEL HERBICIDES DDT, CYP4X1, CYP1B1 RAB9A 3044/4885LMNA 4657/4885SMN1; SMN2 2952/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.