SCHEMBL1039910

SCHEMBL1039910

COc1cc(OC)cc(C(=O)C2CCCCC2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.61

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.61
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.61
KDM2B Q8NHM5 4/20 0.57
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.54
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.53
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.53
POLB P06746 2/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.50
PKM P14618 1/20 0.50
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.48
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.48
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.47
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.47
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.47
SENP8 Q96LD8 1/20 0.47
SENP7 Q9BQF6 1/20 0.47
SENP6 Q9GZR1 1/20 0.47
SRD5A2 P31213 1/20 0.46
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.46
CHRM4 P08173 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1036177 1.00 MEN1 (0.61) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL200723 0.98 KDM2B (0.58) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL4611341 0.84 NPC1 (0.75) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL9135757 0.84 NPC1 (0.75) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL9136904 0.81 NPC1 (0.77) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL23898780 0.81 SIRT5 (0.58) MEN1KMT2ARAB9ANPC1POLB
SCHEMBL24222555 0.81 SIRT5 (0.58) MEN1KMT2ARAB9ANPC1POLB
SCHEMBL23734465 0.81 SIRT5 (0.58) MEN1KMT2ARAB9ANPC1POLB
SCHEMBL18360283 0.81 KDM2B (0.62) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A
SCHEMBL16106340 0.79 NPC1 (0.54) MEN1KMT2AKDM2BLMNARAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1633733-B1 CANNABINOID DERIVATIVES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND USE THEREOF UNIV TENNESSEE RES FOUNDATION (US) 2011-01-26 EP disclosed
US-20070167514-A1 Cannabinoid derivatives, methods of making, and use thereof UNIVERSTIY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2007-07-19 US disclosed
EP-1633733-A4 CANNABINOID DERIVATIVES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND USE THEREOF UNIV TENNESSEE RES CORP (US) 2007-02-28 EP disclosed
US-7169942-B2 agonists or antagonists; treatment for neuroinflammatory pathologies involving demyelinization, viral encephalitis, cerebrovascular accidents, cranial trauma, ocular disorders, pulmonary disorders, allergic diseases, inflammatory conditions, immune system disorders, central nervous system diseases, etc. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2007-01-30 US disclosed
EP-1633733-A1 CANNABINOID DERIVATIVES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND USE THEREOF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH CORPORATION (US) 2006-03-15 EP disclosed
WO-2004113320-A1 CANNABINOID DERIVATIVES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND USE THEREOF THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2004-12-29 WO disclosed
US-20040242593-A1 Cannabinoid derivatives, methods of making, and use thereof UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2004-12-02 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040242593-A1 Cannabinoid derivatives, methods of making, and use thereof CNR2, CNR1, GPR18 MEN1 3863/4885KMT2A 1891/4885KDM2B 2727/4885
US-20070167514-A1 Cannabinoid derivatives, methods of making, and use thereof CNR2, CNR1, GPR18 MEN1 3893/4885KMT2A 1922/4885KDM2B 2772/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.