SCHEMBL1047073

SCHEMBL1047073

O=C(O)CCCC=CC[C@H]1C(=O)C=C[C@@H]1C=C[C@@H](O)COc1cccc(C(F)(F)F)c1

nearest known ligand 0.66

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTGFR P43088 16/20 0.66
PTGER3 P43115 4/20 0.66
TRPA1 O75762 2/20 0.55
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.55
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.55
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.55
POLB P06746 1/20 0.55
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.55
NR4A1 P22736 1/20 0.55
PTPN7 P35236 1/20 0.55
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.55
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.55
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.55
ABCC4 O15439 1/20 0.54
ABCB11 O95342 1/20 0.54
TBXA2R P21731 4/20 0.49
PTGER1 P34995 2/20 0.49
THRB P10828 1/20 0.49
PTGER2 P43116 1/20 0.49

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1047070 1.00 PTGFR (0.66) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1047071 1.00 PTGFR (0.66) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1045489 0.90 PTGFR (0.54) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1045486 0.90 PTGFR (0.54) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1045487 0.90 PTGFR (0.54) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1047115 0.90 PTGFR (0.54) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3342993 0.90 PTGFR (0.68) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1045457 0.90 PTGFR (0.68) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1047117 0.90 PTGFR (0.54) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1045458 0.90 PTGFR (0.68) PTGFRPTGER3TRPA1MEN1ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110002866-A1 METHODS TO PREVENT A HAIR-RELATED SIDE EFFECT OF TREATMENT WITH A CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENT LUBIT BEVERLY W 2011-01-06 US claimed
US-20100074857-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TO TREAT EPITHELIAL-RELATED CONDITIONS LIPKIN PAMELA 2010-03-25 US claimed
US-20110002866-A1 METHODS TO PREVENT A HAIR-RELATED SIDE EFFECT OF TREATMENT WITH A CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENT LUBIT BEVERLY W 2011-01-06 US disclosed
US-20100074857-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TO TREAT EPITHELIAL-RELATED CONDITIONS LIPKIN PAMELA 2010-03-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110002866-A1 METHODS TO PREVENT A HAIR-RELATED SIDE EFFECT OF TREATMENT WITH A CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENT PGF, PTGS1, PTGS2 PTGFR 5/4885PTGER3 75/4885TRPA1 3869/4885
US-20100074857-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TO TREAT EPITHELIAL-RELATED CONDITIONS PTGER1, PGF, PTGER2 PTGFR 6/4885PTGER3 9/4885TRPA1 1588/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.