SCHEMBL11025195

SCHEMBL11025195

CN1CCN(c2cccc(C3CC(C)(C)c4cc(C(N)=O)ccc4N3)c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ F7 P08709 13/20 0.45
▸ F11 P03951 12/20 0.45
▸ F10 P00742 11/20 0.45
▸ PLOD2 O00469 1/20 0.40
▸ PLOD3 O60568 1/20 0.40
▸ PLOD1 Q02809 1/20 0.40
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.40
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
▸ HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.40
▸ TP53BP1 Q12888 1/20 0.38
▸ ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.38
▸ FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11026014 0.92 F11 (0.48) F7F11F10KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL11025237 0.91 F11 (0.44) F7F11F10PLOD2PLOD3
SCHEMBL11025709 0.90 F7 (0.44) F7F11F10PLOD2PLOD3
SCHEMBL11029499 0.89 F10 (0.45) F7F11F10PLOD2PLOD3
SCHEMBL11940903 0.83 SCN9A (0.38) F7F11F10PLOD2PLOD3
SCHEMBL11025706 0.83 KDM4E (0.49) F7F11F10KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL11026479 0.82 CYP2C19 (0.41) F7F11F10PLOD2PLOD3
SCHEMBL43252 0.82 F11 (0.44) F7F11F10KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL41668 0.81 HDAC4 (0.46) F7F11F10KDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL11025379 0.81 F10 (0.48) F7F11F10KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8809369-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2014-08-19 — — US claimed
EP-2668165-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2013-12-04 — — EP claimed
WO-2012101068-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2012-08-02 — — WO claimed
US-20120190677-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2012-07-26 — — US claimed
US-8809369-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2014-08-19 — — US disclosed
EP-2668165-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2013-12-04 — — EP disclosed
WO-2012101068-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2012-08-02 — — WO disclosed
US-20120190677-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2012-07-26 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120190677-A1 NOVEL TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES RAB1A, RABL3, RAB7A F7 2297/4885F11 2989/4885F10 2432/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback