Dolastatin-10

Dolastatin-10

SCHEMBL13378458

CC[C@@H](C)[C@@H](C(CC(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1[C@H](OC)[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nccs1)OC)N(C)C(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)C(C(C)C)N(C)C)C(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.53

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

TUBA1ATUBA1BTUBA1CTUBA3CTUBA3ETUBA4ATUBBTUBB1TUBB2ATUBB2BTUBB3TUBB4ATUBB4BTUBB6TUBB8

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Dolastatin-10. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SSTR2 P30874 2/20 0.40
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.38
FOLH1 Q04609 3/20 0.34
PTPRB P23467 1/20 0.34
TTR P02766 2/20 0.32
CTSD P07339 6/20 0.32
CTSE P14091 6/20 0.32
BACE1 P56817 4/20 0.32
REN P00797 3/20 0.31
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL18793204 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL13135112 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL12016480 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL5286 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL16730776 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL23387006 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL6423272 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL22126284 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL22126283 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR
Dolastatin-10 SCHEMBL14583139 1.00 SSTR2 (0.40) SSTR2CYP3A4FOLH1PTPRBTTR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7696163-B2 Forming a convalent conjugate of a peptide, EPO, removing X2 or a saccharyl subunit thereof from peptide forming a truncated glycan; contacting truncated glycan with glycosyltransferase and modified sugar donor under conditions suitable for glycosyltransferase to transfer a modified sugar moiety NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2010-04-13 US disclosed
US-7696163-B2 Forming a convalent conjugate of a peptide, EPO, removing X2 or a saccharyl subunit thereof from peptide forming a truncated glycan; contacting truncated glycan with glycosyltransferase and modified sugar donor under conditions suitable for glycosyltransferase to transfer a modified sugar moiety NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2010-04-13 US disclosed
US-20070027068-A1 Erythropoietin: remodeling and glycoconjugation of erythropoietin NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2007-02-01 US disclosed
US-20070027068-A1 Erythropoietin: remodeling and glycoconjugation of erythropoietin NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2007-02-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070027068-A1 Erythropoietin: remodeling and glycoconjugation of erythropoietin EPOR, HBG2, HAMP SSTR2 894/4885CYP3A4 4670/4885FOLH1 147/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.