SCHEMBL13380211

SCHEMBL13380211

COc1cc(C(C)=O)ccc1OCCCN1CCOCC1

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.64
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.64
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.60
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.60
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.58
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.58
HTR1A P08908 2/20 0.56
HTR2A P28223 2/20 0.56
ABCB11 O95342 1/20 0.56
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.56
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.56
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.56
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.56
ADRA2B P18089 1/20 0.56
ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.56
DRD1 P21728 1/20 0.56
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.56
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.56
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.56
HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.56

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5494919 0.91 KDM4E (0.66) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL3531517 0.86 SMN1; SMN2 (0.63) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL14667316 0.85 HTR1A (0.53) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1HTR1A
SCHEMBL3470303 0.85 CYP2D6 (0.65) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL23195558 0.84 KDM4E (0.61) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL4267324 0.83 CYP2D6 (0.60) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL23195583 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.65) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL6447779 0.82 SMN1; SMN2 (0.63) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL20462782 0.81 CYP2D6 (0.64) CYP2D6CYP2C9KDM4ETDP1TSHR
SCHEMBL11961176 0.81 TSHR (0.61) CYP2D6KDM4ETDP1TSHRLMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20130030172-A1 Methods of Preparing Quinoline Derivatives EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2013-01-31 US disclosed
US-8314232-B2 Preparation of a quinolinyloxydiphenylcyclopropanedicarboxamide GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2012-11-20 US disclosed
US-8314232-B2 Preparation of a quinolinyloxydiphenylcyclopropanedicarboxamide GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2012-11-20 US disclosed
US-20100081805-A1 Preparation of a Quinolinyloxydiphenylcyclopropanedicarboxamide EXELIXIS, INC. 2010-04-01 US disclosed
US-20100081805-A1 Preparation of a Quinolinyloxydiphenylcyclopropanedicarboxamide EXELIXIS, INC. 2010-04-01 US disclosed
WO-2010036831-A1 PREPARATION OF A QUINOLINYLOXYDIPHENYLCYCLOPROPANEDICARBOXAMIDE GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2010-04-01 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130030172-A1 Methods of Preparing Quinoline Derivatives F12, RECQL, H1-2 CYP2D6 19/4885CYP2C9 124/4885KDM4E 3851/4885
US-20100081805-A1 Preparation of a Quinolinyloxydiphenylcyclopropanedicarboxamide QDPR, CBR3, NQO2 CYP2D6 80/4885CYP2C9 89/4885KDM4E 1032/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.