Arginine

Arginine

SCHEMBL15110976

C[C@H](NC1CCCCC1)C(=O)O.C[C@H](NC1CCCCC1)C(=O)O.N=C(N)NCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O.N=C(N)NCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O.N=C(N)NCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.39

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

S1PR1S1PR4S1PR5

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Arginine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ OTC P00480 1/20 0.39
▸ NOS3 P29474 1/20 0.37
▸ NOS1 P29475 1/20 0.37
▸ NOS2 P35228 1/20 0.37
▸ DDAH1 O94760 1/20 0.37
▸ EPHX2 P34913 5/20 0.37
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.36
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.36
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
▸ NPY4R P50391 3/20 0.35
▸ NPY1R P25929 2/20 0.35
▸ NPY2R P49146 2/20 0.35
▸ NPY5R Q15761 2/20 0.35
▸ EPHX1 P07099 3/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Arginine SCHEMBL11905098 0.98 OTC (0.37) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL27539177 0.90 OTC (0.32) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL11905345 0.89 PRCP (0.35) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL11905875 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.34) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL244720 0.86 OTC (0.43) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL8743763 0.83 OTC (0.51) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Arginine SCHEMBL31181943 0.82 OTC (0.43) OTCNOS3NOS1NOS2DDAH1
Lysine SCHEMBL237659 0.81 GSR (0.54) —
Lysine SCHEMBL237658 0.81 GSR (0.54) —
SCHEMBL27632265 0.80 SMN1; SMN2 (0.45) EPHX2SMN1; SMN2EPHX1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
WO-2013106819-A2 ZINC-RESPONSIVE PEPTIDES, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2013-07-18 — — WO claimed
US-8883962-B2 Zinc-responsive peptides, and methods of use thereof MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2014-11-11 — — US disclosed
US-20130224760-A1 Zinc-Responsive Peptides, and Methods of Use Thereof MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2013-08-29 — — US disclosed
WO-2013106819-A2 ZINC-RESPONSIVE PEPTIDES, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2013-07-18 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130224760-A1 Zinc-Responsive Peptides, and Methods of Use Thereof SLC30A6, SLC30A7, SLC39A3 OTC 2148/4885NOS3 2492/4885NOS1 2881/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback