SCHEMBL15427010

SCHEMBL15427010

O=C1CC(c2cc(Br)ccc2F)c2c(ccc3ccccc23)N1

nearest known ligand 0.67

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TP53 P04637 5/20 0.67
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.67
POLB P06746 1/20 0.67
SIRT2 Q8IXJ6 1/20 0.61
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.56
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.56
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.53
IDO1 P14902 2/20 0.44
SIRT1 Q96EB6 1/20 0.43
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL880359 0.76 TP53 (0.71) TP53MAPTPOLBSIRT2LMNA
SCHEMBL15427002 0.75 LMNA (0.54) TP53MAPTLMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL880346 0.74 TP53 (0.80) TP53MAPTPOLBSIRT2LMNA
SCHEMBL10280347 0.73 KMT2A (0.70) TP53MAPTPOLBLMNAMEN1
SCHEMBL880443 0.73 TP53 (0.76) TP53MAPTPOLBSIRT2LMNA
SCHEMBL880433 0.72 TP53 (0.69) TP53MAPTPOLBSIRT2LMNA
SCHEMBL15427062 0.72 LMNA (0.62) TP53MAPTLMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL30162895 0.72 SMN1; SMN2 (0.63) MAPTLMNAMEN1KMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL15427005 0.72 SMN1; SMN2 (0.63) MAPTLMNAMEN1KMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14094474 0.71 SIRT2 (0.66) TP53MAPTPOLBSIRT2LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160052935-A1 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS 2016-02-25 US disclosed
US-20160052935-A1 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS 2016-02-25 US disclosed
US-9212209-B2 Screening methods for spinal muscular atrophy INDIANA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (US) 2015-12-15 US disclosed
US-9212209-B2 Screening methods for spinal muscular atrophy INDIANA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (US) 2015-12-15 US disclosed
US-20140193906-A1 SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS 2014-07-10 US disclosed
US-20140193906-A1 SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS 2014-07-10 US disclosed
WO-2014012050-A2 COMPOUNDS FOR TREATMENT OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY INDIANA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (US) 2014-01-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160052935-A1 COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY SMN1; SMN2, CPT1B, MTPN TP53 4374/4885MAPT 1135/4885POLB 454/4885
US-20140193906-A1 SCREENING METHODS FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY SMN1; SMN2, MYOF, MTPN TP53 4378/4885MAPT 800/4885POLB 438/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.