Predicted protein targets (top 16)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | POLB | P06746 | 1/20 | 1.00 |
| ▸ | ALDH1A1 | P00352 | 10/20 | 0.98 |
| ▸ | RECQL | P46063 | 1/20 | 0.98 |
| ▸ | GAA | P10253 | 2/20 | 0.79 |
| ▸ | HPGD | P15428 | 2/20 | 0.65 |
| ▸ | SMN1; SMN2 | Q16637 | 1/20 | 0.64 |
| ▸ | CYP1A2 | P05177 | 1/20 | 0.64 |
| ▸ | CYP3A4 | P08684 | 1/20 | 0.64 |
| ▸ | CYP2C9 | P11712 | 1/20 | 0.64 |
| ▸ | CYP2C19 | P33261 | 1/20 | 0.64 |
| ▸ | KMT2A | Q03164 | 3/20 | 0.62 |
| ▸ | MEN1 | O00255 | 2/20 | 0.62 |
| ▸ | LMNA | P02545 | 1/20 | 0.62 |
| ▸ | ALOX12 | P18054 | 1/20 | 0.62 |
| ▸ | MCL1 | Q07820 | 1/20 | 0.62 |
| ▸ | GPR55 | Q9Y2T6 | 1/20 | 0.60 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL15836654 | 0.87 | ALDH1A1 (0.98) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15836650 | 0.87 | ALDH1A1 (0.98) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15836683 | 0.84 | ALDH1A1 (0.80) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAKMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL15836670 | 0.79 | ALDH1A1 (1.00) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15836690 | 0.78 | POLB (0.64) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAASMN1; SMN2 | |
| SCHEMBL4759272 | 0.75 | KMT2A (0.78) | ALDH1A1GAAKMT2AMEN1LMNA | |
| SCHEMBL15836673 | 0.74 | ALDH1A1 (0.78) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15836668 | 0.74 | ALDH1A1 (0.69) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15836674 | 0.74 | ALDH1A1 (0.63) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD | |
| SCHEMBL15840664 | 0.74 | LMNA (0.72) | POLBALDH1A1RECQLGAAHPGD |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140179681-A1 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS OF TARGETED DRUG DEVELOPMENT | Errico, Joseph P. (US) | 2014-06-26 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140179681-A1 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS OF TARGETED DRUG DEVELOPMENT | Errico, Joseph P. (US) | 2014-06-26 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140179681-A1 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS OF TARGETED DRUG DEVELOPMENT | EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3 | POLB 3390/4885ALDH1A1 4348/4885RECQL 3452/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.