SCHEMBL16436141

SCHEMBL16436141

C=C1N=C(N)C=CN1[C@@H]1CS[C@H](COC)O1

nearest known ligand 0.32

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ ALB P02768 3/20 0.32
▸ POLG P54098 2/20 0.32
▸ CACNA1F O60840 2/20 0.31
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.31
▸ MAPT P10636 2/20 0.31
▸ CACNA1D Q01668 2/20 0.31
▸ CACNA1S Q13698 2/20 0.31
▸ CACNA1C Q13936 2/20 0.31
▸ PDE3A Q14432 2/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17232097 1.00 ALB (0.32) ALBPOLGCACNA1FLMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL15369632 0.84 ALB (0.46) ALBCACNA1FLMNAMAPTCACNA1D
SCHEMBL19871162 0.84 — —
SCHEMBL17232087 0.79 POLG (0.34) ALBPOLG
SCHEMBL19871149 0.79 — —
SCHEMBL17232098 0.78 — —
SCHEMBL17232084 0.76 — —
SCHEMBL19871163 0.72 — —
SCHEMBL19871157 0.72 — —
SCHEMBL19871147 0.71 — —

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160263114-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING RETINAL DEGRADATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2016-09-15 — — US disclosed
US-9326983-B2 Compositions and methods for treating retinal degradation UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2016-05-03 — — US disclosed
US-20150038446-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING RETINAL DEGRADATION UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2015-02-05 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160263114-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING RETINAL DEGRADATION ALDH1A2, UNG, DNASE1L3 ALB 4270/4885POLG 57/4885CACNA1F 4861/4885
US-20150038446-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING RETINAL DEGRADATION ALDH1A2, UNG, DNASE1L3 ALB 4270/4885POLG 57/4885CACNA1F 4861/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback