SCHEMBL16632829

SCHEMBL16632829

C=CCc1cc(O)c(O)c(C(=O)OC)c1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TNKS O95271 2/20 0.52
TNKS2 Q9H2K2 1/20 0.52
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.45
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.44
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.44
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.44
CA7 P43166 2/20 0.44
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.44
CA14 Q9ULX7 2/20 0.44
PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.44
PDK4 Q16654 1/20 0.44
GAA P10253 3/20 0.43
XDH P47989 2/20 0.43
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.43
POLB P06746 2/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.43
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.43
GFER P55789 1/20 0.43
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.43
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30763302 0.85 TNKS (0.57) TNKSTNKS2GAAKDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL16429697 0.85 TNKS (0.57) TNKSTNKS2GAAKDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL17936610 0.84 TNKS (0.40) TNKSTNKS2GAAKDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL5676528 0.78 CA12 (0.46) CA12CA1CA2CA7CA9
SCHEMBL12490220 0.77 PTGS1 (0.47) CA12CA1CA2CA7CA9
SCHEMBL16432180 0.76 PTGS1 (0.49) TNKSTNKS2KDM4EPOLBTDP1
SCHEMBL2493537 0.75 TNKS (0.63) TNKSTNKS2PARP1GAAXDH
SCHEMBL3961509 0.75 CA12 (0.47) CA12CA1CA2CA7CA9
SCHEMBL10777241 0.75 PTGS1 (0.48) GAAXDHKDM4EPOLBLMNA
SCHEMBL18338811 0.75 TNKS (0.84) TNKSTNKS2PARP1GAAXDH

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9902986-B2 Enterobactin conjugates and uses thereof MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2018-02-27 US disclosed
US-9902986-B2 Enterobactin conjugates and uses thereof MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2018-02-27 US disclosed
WO-2015057958-A2 ENTEROBACTIN CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2015-04-23 WO disclosed
US-20150105337-A1 ENTEROBACTIN CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2015-04-16 US disclosed
US-20150105337-A1 ENTEROBACTIN CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2015-04-16 US disclosed
US-20150105337-A1 ENTEROBACTIN CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (US) 2015-04-16 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150105337-A1 ENTEROBACTIN CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF BTD, VIP, SLC10A2 TNKS 2739/4885TNKS2 3182/4885PARP1 2230/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.