SCHEMBL1717680

SCHEMBL1717680

CCC(NC(=O)c1c(CN2CCN(C(=O)OC(C)(C)C)CC2)n(-c2ccccc2)c(=O)c2ccccc12)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TACR3 P29371 15/20 0.43
TACR2 P21452 8/20 0.43
OPRM1 P35372 5/20 0.43
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.41
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.41
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.41
TACR1 P25103 1/20 0.41
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.41
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.40
CHRM4 P08173 1/20 0.40
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.40
CHRM3 P20309 1/20 0.40
DTYMK P23919 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1717450 0.93 TACR2 (0.50) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1717757 0.93 TACR2 (0.48) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1716895 0.91 TACR3 (0.45) TACR3TACR2OPRM1
SCHEMBL1717699 0.90 TACR3 (0.43) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1717711 0.89 SIGMAR1 (0.46) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1718106 0.89 TACR3 (0.42) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1717435 0.88 TACR3 (0.47) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1718080 0.88 TACR3 (0.43) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1723402 0.88 TACR3 (0.43) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1717901 0.88 TACR3 (0.43) TACR3TACR2OPRM1CYP1A2CYP3A4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8173639-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2012-05-08 US claimed
EP-2150534-B1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS LUNDBECK & CO AS H (DK) 2012-01-11 EP claimed
US-20090143402-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2009-06-04 US claimed
US-8173639-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2012-05-08 US disclosed
EP-2150534-B1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS LUNDBECK & CO AS H (DK) 2012-01-11 EP disclosed
US-20090143402-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2009-06-04 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090143402-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS KCNQ3, KCNK3, GRIK3 TACR3 30/4885TACR2 31/4885OPRM1 892/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.