SCHEMBL19257788

SCHEMBL19257788

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCO[C@H](CO)CC[C@@H](O)CO

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.53
CNR2 P34972 9/20 0.50
CNR1 P21554 8/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.50
PLA2G2C Q5R387 1/20 0.48
DNM1 Q05193 1/20 0.47
LPAR6 P43657 1/20 0.41
LPAR1 Q92633 1/20 0.41
LPAR4 Q99677 1/20 0.41
LPAR5 Q9H1C0 1/20 0.41
LPAR2 Q9HBW0 1/20 0.41
LPAR3 Q9UBY5 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19257787 0.91 CNR2 (0.58) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL19257793 0.88 USP2 (0.67) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1PLA2G2C
SCHEMBL4925955 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL3391670 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL9328381 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL9329951 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL10520454 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL11300731 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL7800390 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1
SCHEMBL19669679 0.85 CNR2 (0.56) USP2CNR2CNR1ALDH1A1DNM1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170233337-A1 NON-IONIC AMPHIPHILES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO (IL) 2017-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170233337-A1 NON-IONIC AMPHIPHILES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME PNLIP, FFAR4, SPTLC2 USP2 2124/4885CNR2 1830/4885CNR1 1851/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.