SCHEMBL19257794

SCHEMBL19257794

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOC[C@H](O)CC[C@H](O)COCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

nearest known ligand 0.74

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.74
HTT P42858 2/20 0.71
LPAR5 Q9H1C0 4/20 0.61
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.60
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.60
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.60
SPHK1 Q9NYA1 1/20 0.55
PLA2G2C Q5R387 2/20 0.54
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.48
THRB P10828 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.48
LPAR1 Q92633 7/20 0.47
LPAR3 Q9UBY5 7/20 0.47
LPAR2 Q9HBW0 4/20 0.47
LPAR6 P43657 3/20 0.47
LPAR4 Q99677 3/20 0.47
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.46
CES2 O00748 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL631005 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL11230218 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL9330015 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1629995 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL21187461 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL10893424 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL7644994 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL10511992 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL4295700 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL3392479 0.94 USP2 (0.71) USP2HTTLPAR5CYP1A2CYP3A4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170233337-A1 NON-IONIC AMPHIPHILES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO (IL) 2017-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170233337-A1 NON-IONIC AMPHIPHILES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME PNLIP, FFAR4, SPTLC2 USP2 2124/4885HTT 1752/4885LPAR5 787/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.