SCHEMBL1960573

SCHEMBL1960573

CCCCCCCCCC[n+]1cccc2ccccc21

nearest known ligand 0.97

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.97
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.97
RGS12 O14924 1/20 0.97
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.97
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.97
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.97
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.97
THRB P10828 1/20 0.97
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.97
HTT P42858 1/20 0.97
RAD52 P43351 1/20 0.97
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.97
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.97
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.97
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.97
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.97
BCHE P06276 13/20 0.82
ACHE P22303 13/20 0.82

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9319117 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL4068375 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL1963218 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL29721510 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL4061564 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL4071951 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL1412685 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
SCHEMBL1412766 1.00 KDM4E (0.97) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
Bromide SCHEMBL3359102 0.98 KDM4E (0.93) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL780409 0.98 KDM4E (0.93) KDM4EMEN1RGS12NPC1USP2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110144079-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM THE QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY OF BELFAST (GB) 2011-06-16 US claimed
US-20110144079-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM THE QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY OF BELFAST (GB) 2011-06-16 US disclosed
WO-2009040107-A2 METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF METAL-CONTAINING NANOPARTICLES ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG (DE) 2009-04-02 WO disclosed
WO-2009024312-A2 METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION AND STABILIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL METAL NANOPARTICLES IN IONIC LIQUIDS ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG (DE) 2009-02-26 WO disclosed
EP-0340421-B1 Conducting varnish composition NITTO CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO LTD (JP) 1993-11-10 EP disclosed
US-5009811-A Containing tetracyanoquinodimethan complex salts, thermo-plastic polymers, acetals, ortho acid esters, disiloxanes, silyl esters and acids, solvent and surfactants NITTO CHEMICAL INDUSTRY COMPANY, LTD. (JP) 1991-04-23 US disclosed
EP-0340421-A2 Conducting varnish composition NITTO CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD. (JP) 1989-11-08 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110144079-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM PIK3C3, POLR1C, LTN1 KDM4E 3065/4885MEN1 4090/4885RGS12 2540/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.