SCHEMBL19808335

SCHEMBL19808335

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)NS(=O)(=O)Nc1ccc(NC(N)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 3/20 0.47
CA12 O43570 3/20 0.47
CA14 Q9ULX7 3/20 0.47
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.47
CA2 P00918 3/20 0.44
KIF11 P52732 3/20 0.44
PEPD P12955 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.41
GLA P06280 1/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.40
CYP17A1 P05093 1/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.38
GFER P55789 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18519525 0.85 CA12 (0.49) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL8237935 0.84 CA12 (0.50) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL12107288 0.82 CA12 (0.49) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL8246618 0.82 CA12 (0.49) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL16038956 0.82 CA12 (0.62) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL18028464 0.81 KIF11 (0.54) CA1CA12KIF11PEPDALDH1A1
SCHEMBL22638581 0.81 CA12 (0.51) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL24667477 0.80 HPGD (0.54) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL8244234 0.80 CA12 (0.53) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2
SCHEMBL4892802 0.78 CA1 (0.58) CA1CA12CA14CA7CA2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10202388-B2 Fused-ring compounds, pharmaceutical composition and uses thereof Shanghai De Novo Pharmatech Co., Ltd. (CN) 2019-02-12 US disclosed
US-20180022752-A1 FUSED-RING COMPOUNDS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION AND USES THEREOF Shanghai De Novo Pharmatech Co., Ltd. (CN) 2018-01-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10202388-B2 Fused-ring compounds, pharmaceutical composition and uses thereof IDO1, IDO2, TDO2 CA1 1754/4885CA12 1331/4885CA14 765/4885
US-20180022752-A1 FUSED-RING COMPOUNDS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION AND USES THEREOF IDO1, IDO2, TDO2 CA1 1754/4885CA12 1331/4885CA14 765/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.