SCHEMBL20175458

SCHEMBL20175458

Cc1cccc(C(=O)N/N=C/c2ccc(O)cc2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.74

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.74
MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.74
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.70
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.70
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.70
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.70
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.70
GAA P10253 1/20 0.70
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.70
POLB P06746 3/20 0.67
CTDSP1 Q9GZU7 1/20 0.67
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.63
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.63
ESRRG P62508 2/20 0.63
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.63
PKM P14618 1/20 0.63
HTT P42858 1/20 0.60

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL27178222 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.76) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL27178216 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.76) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL27178088 0.87 SMN1; SMN2 (0.75) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL28520310 0.87 MAPT (0.76) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL30826121 0.87 SMN1; SMN2 (0.75) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL27178082 0.87 SMN1; SMN2 (0.75) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL1129164 0.86 RAB9A (0.78) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL13791267 0.86 RAB9A (0.78) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL20175460 0.85 MAPT (0.74) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL10802330 0.85 SMN1; SMN2 (0.84) KMT2AMEN1RAB9ANPC1MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20180141897-A1 ANTI-FUNGALS TARGETING THE SYNTHESIS OF FUNGAL SHINGOLIPIDS THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (US) 2018-05-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180141897-A1 ANTI-FUNGALS TARGETING THE SYNTHESIS OF FUNGAL SHINGOLIPIDS LSS, ERG28, CYP51A1 KMT2A 3034/4885MEN1 1342/4885RAB9A 3225/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.