SCHEMBL202096

SCHEMBL202096

Nc1nc2cccnc2c2c1nc1n2OCCC1

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PRMT5 O14744 1/20 0.37
HRH4 Q9H3N8 1/20 0.36
PIK3CD O00329 6/20 0.35
PIK3CA P42336 6/20 0.34
PIK3CG P48736 5/20 0.34
MTOR P42345 2/20 0.34
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL202097 0.82 TLR7 (0.42) ACHE
SCHEMBL202179 0.80 KDM4E (0.35) PIK3CDPIK3CAPIK3CGMTOR
SCHEMBL202353 0.79 TLR7 (0.41)
SCHEMBL202499 0.74 TLR7 (0.44)
SCHEMBL12165325 0.72 PIK3CD (0.42) PRMT5HRH4PIK3CDPIK3CAPIK3CG
SCHEMBL1775272 0.68 PRMT5 (0.37) PRMT5HRH4PIK3CDPIK3CAPIK3CG
SCHEMBL10123111 0.66 PRMT5 (0.50) PRMT5HRH4
SCHEMBL202424 0.66 KDM4E (0.38) ACHE
SCHEMBL4299811 0.65 TLR7 (0.42) PRMT5HRH4PIK3CDPIK3CAPIK3CG
SCHEMBL1774015 0.65 PRMT5 (0.35) PRMT5HRH4PIK3CDPIK3CAPIK3CG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed
WO-2007106852-A2 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2]IMIDAZO[4,5-C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS COLEY PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP, INC. (US) 2007-09-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS IL2, IFNG, IL4 PRMT5 959/4885HRH4 94/4885PIK3CD 1065/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.