SCHEMBL22689689

SCHEMBL22689689

NC(Cc1cccc(NC(=O)CCCCCCCCl)c1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ NOS3 P29474 1/20 0.57
▸ NOS1 P29475 1/20 0.57
▸ NOS2 P35228 1/20 0.57
▸ HDAC1 Q13547 6/20 0.51
▸ HDAC6 Q9UBN7 6/20 0.51
▸ HDAC3 O15379 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC4 P56524 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC7 Q8WUI4 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC2 Q92769 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC10 Q969S8 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC11 Q96DB2 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC8 Q9BY41 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC9 Q9UKV0 4/20 0.51
▸ HDAC5 Q9UQL6 4/20 0.51
▸ PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.50
▸ MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.47
▸ KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.47
▸ SLC7A5 Q01650 4/20 0.46
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.46
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29551005 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL29550721 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689821 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689688 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689718 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689800 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689720 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689819 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22689799 1.00 NOS3 (0.57) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL22691458 0.99 NOS3 (0.58) NOS3NOS1NOS2HDAC1HDAC6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-12460317-B2 Genetically encoded, phage-displayed cyclic peptide library and methods of making the same THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2025-11-04 — — US disclosed
US-20230139680-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2023-05-04 — — US disclosed
EP-3972625-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME The Texas A&M University System (US) 2022-03-30 — — EP disclosed
CN-113727725-A Genetically encoded phage-displayed cyclic peptide libraries and methods of making the same 得克萨斯A&M大学系统 2021-11-30 — — CN disclosed
WO-2020236146-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2020-11-26 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230139680-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME QPCTL, LNPEP, QPCT NOS3 2430/4885NOS1 2420/4885NOS2 2097/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback