SCHEMBL22689733

SCHEMBL22689733

N[C@@H](Cc1cccc(NS(=O)(=O)CCl)c1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NOS3 P29474 3/20 0.55
NOS1 P29475 3/20 0.55
NOS2 P35228 3/20 0.55
SLC7A5 Q01650 8/20 0.50
PTGS1 P23219 2/20 0.50
ALPI P09923 1/20 0.50
PKM P14618 1/20 0.50
XIAP P98170 1/20 0.50
GRIA2 P42262 1/20 0.49
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.44
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.44
EGFR P00533 1/20 0.44
LCK P06239 1/20 0.44
FYN P06241 1/20 0.44
ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.44
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.44
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.44
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.44
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.44
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29551024 1.00 NOS3 (0.55) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22689734 1.00 NOS3 (0.55) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22690015 0.90 NOS3 (0.53) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22690014 0.90 NOS3 (0.53) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL29549928 0.88 NOS3 (0.51) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22690396 0.88 NOS3 (0.51) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22690395 0.88 NOS3 (0.51) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22689929 0.87 NOS3 (0.55) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22689783 0.87 NOS3 (0.55) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1
SCHEMBL22689927 0.87 NOS3 (0.55) NOS3NOS1NOS2SLC7A5PTGS1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-12460317-B2 Genetically encoded, phage-displayed cyclic peptide library and methods of making the same THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2025-11-04 US disclosed
US-20230139680-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2023-05-04 US disclosed
EP-3972625-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME The Texas A&M University System (US) 2022-03-30 EP disclosed
CN-113727725-A Genetically encoded phage-displayed cyclic peptide libraries and methods of making the same 得克萨斯A&M大学系统 2021-11-30 CN disclosed
WO-2020236146-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (US) 2020-11-26 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230139680-A1 A GENETICALLY ENCODED, PHAGE-DISPLAYED CYCLIC PEPTIDE LIBRARY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME QPCTL, LNPEP, QPCT NOS3 2430/4885NOS1 2420/4885NOS2 2097/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.