SCHEMBL2296102

SCHEMBL2296102

CCCCCn1c(O)nc2ncc(Cl)c(-c3cccc(C)n3)c21

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SIK2 Q9H0K1 11/20 0.35
STK26 Q9P289 11/20 0.35
STK24 Q9Y6E0 11/20 0.35
STK4 Q13043 10/20 0.35
STK3 Q13188 10/20 0.35
TLR8 Q9NR97 4/20 0.35
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.34
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.34
CNR2 P34972 2/20 0.33
RET P07949 1/20 0.33
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.33
CSNK1E P49674 1/20 0.33
PAK1 Q13153 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2296013 0.87 AXL (0.35) TLR8KMT2ACNR2
SCHEMBL2300132 0.87 TLR8 (0.34) TLR8CNR2
SCHEMBL2298083 0.86 TLR8 (0.37) TLR8MEN1KMT2ACNR2CNR1
SCHEMBL2297637 0.84 FLT3 (0.36) TLR8CNR2
SCHEMBL2298187 0.83 TLR8 (0.37) TLR8MEN1KMT2ARET
SCHEMBL2295859 0.83 TP53 (0.47) TLR8CNR2
SCHEMBL2296228 0.83 CYP19A1 (0.36) TLR8MEN1KMT2ARET
SCHEMBL2298814 0.82 KDM4E (0.42) TLR8CNR2
SCHEMBL2300170 0.82 TLR8 (0.38) TLR8CNR2CNR1
SCHEMBL2302534 0.82 TLR8 (0.44) TLR8MEN1KMT2ACNR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7989469-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2011-08-02 US claimed
EP-2244711-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-11-03 EP claimed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US claimed
WO-2009099594-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2009-08-13 WO claimed
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-7989469-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2011-08-02 US disclosed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 SIK2 1419/4885STK26 810/4885STK24 740/4885
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 SIK2 1411/4885STK26 876/4885STK24 801/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.