Oxalic Acid

Oxalic Acid

SCHEMBL2438372

NCCc1nnn(C(c2ccccc2)(c2ccccc2)c2ccccc2)n1.O=C(O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.39

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

OPRM1SLC6A4

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Oxalic Acid. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DAGLA Q9Y4D2 3/20 0.39
POLB P06746 2/20 0.34
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.34
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.33
MGLL Q99685 2/20 0.32
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.32
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.31
KIF11 P52732 2/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
GAA P10253 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.31
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.30
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.30
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.30
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.30
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.30
LOXL2 Q9Y4K0 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12327489 0.93 DAGLA (0.35) DAGLASMN1; SMN2KIF11CYP2A6HTR2A
SCHEMBL5840971 0.83 MAOA (0.40) DAGLAKIF11MAPTCYP2D6
SCHEMBL18982574 0.81 NOTUM (0.34) POLBSMN1; SMN2KIF11TAAR1LOXL2
SCHEMBL2897339 0.80 HPGD (0.42) DAGLAPOLBSMN1; SMN2HPGDMGLL
SCHEMBL1121836 0.79 NOTUM (0.35) DAGLAPOLBSMN1; SMN2HPGDCNR2
SCHEMBL8131036 0.78 DAGLA (0.32) DAGLA
SCHEMBL653830 0.74 CYP11B1 (0.33) POLBSMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL752388 0.74 POLB (0.33) DAGLAPOLBSMN1; SMN2TRPV1CNR2
SCHEMBL2438374 0.74 KIF11 (0.33) POLBSMN1; SMN2HPGDKIF11CYP1A2
SCHEMBL22832703 0.74 IDO1 (0.36)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2549873-A1 NOVEL SPIRO IMIDAZOLONES AS GLUCAGON RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (US) 2013-01-30 EP disclosed
US-20130012434-A1 NOVEL SPIRO IMIDAZOLONES AS GLUCAGON RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. 2013-01-10 US disclosed
WO-2011119559-A1 NOVEL SPIRO IMIDAZOLONES AS GLUCAGON RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE SCHERING CORPORATION (US) 2011-09-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130012434-A1 NOVEL SPIRO IMIDAZOLONES AS GLUCAGON RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE GLP1R, GCGR, GIPR DAGLA 1685/4885POLB 4791/4885SMN1; SMN2 4276/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.