SCHEMBL2466047

SCHEMBL2466047

CC(C)Oc1cc(OC(C)C)cc(C(=O)c2ccccc2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.54
GABRB1 P18505 1/20 0.54
ELANE P08246 3/20 0.53
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.52
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.52
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.50
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.50
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.50
KAT6A Q92794 1/20 0.50
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.50
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.50
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.50
GAA P10253 1/20 0.50
HTT P42858 1/20 0.50
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.50
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.50
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.50
RXRA P19793 1/20 0.49
RXRB P28702 1/20 0.49
PTGS1 P23219 3/20 0.49

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14446354 0.91 ATM (0.59) GABRA1GABRB1ELANEALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL18978115 0.87 KMT2A (0.69) GABRA1GABRB1ELANEALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL1534312 0.87 KMT2A (0.69) GABRA1GABRB1ELANEALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL20496485 0.87 KMT2A (0.63) ELANEALDH1A1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL6322882 0.85 KMT2A (0.61) ALDH1A1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1
SCHEMBL19018120 0.82 KMT2A (0.62) ELANEALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL18978109 0.82 KMT2A (0.62) ELANEALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2464374 0.81 HTT (0.59) ELANEALDH1A1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL151012 0.80 KMT2A (0.64) ALDH1A1KMT2AMEN1GAAHTT
SCHEMBL15281240 0.80 KMT2A (0.59) ELANEALDH1A1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170022232-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS SCHRODI YANN (US) 2017-01-26 US disclosed
US-9273081-B2 Method for in-situ formation of metathesis catalysts ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company 2016-03-01 US disclosed
US-20150299235-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company 2015-10-22 US disclosed
US-20130204026-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS MATERIA, INC. (US) 2013-08-08 US disclosed
WO-2011119778-A2 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS SCHRODI YANN (US) 2011-09-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150299235-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS CHRM1, ACSL1, LOXL1 GABRA1 4591/4885GABRB1 4687/4885ELANE 822/4885
US-20170022232-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS CHRM1, ACSL1, LOXL1 GABRA1 4591/4885GABRB1 4687/4885ELANE 822/4885
US-20130204026-A1 METHOD FOR IN-SITU FORMATION OF METATHESIS CATALYSTS CHRM1, ACSL1, LOXL1 GABRA1 4591/4885GABRB1 4687/4885ELANE 822/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.