Formic Acid

Formic Acid

SCHEMBL2524899

CCCc1nccn1C.O=CO

nearest known ligand 0.45

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.45
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.45
FDPS P14324 1/20 0.45
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.38
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.38
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.37
PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.37
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.37
PDE4C Q08493 1/20 0.37
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.37
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.37
HTT P42858 1/20 0.37
LPO P22079 1/20 0.35
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.35
OPRK1 P41145 1/20 0.34
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.34
APLNR P35414 1/20 0.34
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL48932 0.89
Formic Acid SCHEMBL30918154 0.87 KMT2A (0.41) KMT2AMEN1FDPSFNTAFNTB
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL30754387 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
SCHEMBL30101478 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL26676426 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL27683928 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
Iodide SCHEMBL633577 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
Bromide SCHEMBL27242084 0.87 FDPS (0.43) KMT2AMEN1FDPSCNR2TSHR
SCHEMBL28531968 0.86 FDPS (0.45) KMT2AMEN1FDPSFNTAFNTB
Sulfuric Acid SCHEMBL29793357 0.86 FDPS (0.45) KMT2AMEN1FDPSFNTAFNTB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 14 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9683309-B2 Process for electrospinning chitin fibers from chitinous biomass solution BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2017-06-20 US disclosed
EP-2257669-B1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF UNIV ALABAMA (US) 2017-03-22 EP disclosed
US-9394375-B2 Compositions containing recyclable ionic liquids for use in biomass processing BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2016-07-19 US disclosed
US-20160082141-A1 CHITIN AND ALGINATE COMPOSITE FIBERS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA 2016-03-24 US disclosed
WO-2014172703-A1 CHITIN AND ALGINATE COMPOSITE FIBERS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2014-10-23 WO disclosed
US-8668807-B2 Ionic liquid systems for the processing of biomass, their components and/or derivatives, and mixtures thereof BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2014-03-11 US disclosed
US-20140027938-A1 PROCESS FOR ELECTROSPINNING CHITIN FIBERS FROM CHITINOUS BIOMASS SOLUTION AND FIBERS AND ARTICLES PRODUCED THEREBY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2014-01-30 US disclosed
WO-2014018586-A1 PROCESS FOR ELECTROSPINNING CHITIN FIBERS FROM CHITINOUS BIOMASS SOLUTION AND FIBERS AND ARTICLES PRODUCED THEREBY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2014-01-30 WO disclosed
US-20120245336-A1 COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING RECYCLABLE IONIC LIQUIDS FOR USE IN BIOMASS PROCESSING BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2012-09-27 US disclosed
US-20110251377-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2011-10-13 US disclosed
US-20100319862-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2010-12-23 US disclosed
EP-2257669-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama (US) 2010-12-08 EP disclosed
WO-2010056790-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2010-05-20 WO disclosed
WO-2009105236-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA (US) 2009-08-27 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110251377-A1 IONIC LIQUID SYSTEMS FOR THE PROCESSING OF BIOMASS, THEIR COMPONENTS AND/OR DERIVATIVES, AND MIXTURES THEREOF IPMK, AGL, PGLS KMT2A 3974/4885MEN1 3171/4885FDPS 139/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.