SCHEMBL25329367

SCHEMBL25329367

O=C(O)NC1Cc2ccccc2NC1=O

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PYGL P06737 11/20 0.64
PYGM P11217 9/20 0.64
RIPK1 Q13546 5/20 0.46
GAA P10253 1/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.45
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.44
CREBBP Q92793 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29900499 1.00 PYGL (0.64) PYGLPYGMRIPK1GAAMAPT
SCHEMBL15541576 1.00 PYGL (0.64) PYGLPYGMRIPK1GAAMAPT
SCHEMBL2837105 0.86 PYGL (0.60) PYGLPYGMRIPK1BRD4CREBBP
SCHEMBL1976547 0.85 PYGL (0.66) PYGLPYGMRIPK1
SCHEMBL4216634 0.85 PYGL (0.66) PYGLPYGMRIPK1
SCHEMBL4232147 0.85 PYGL (0.66) PYGLPYGMRIPK1
SCHEMBL22469203 0.82 PYGL (0.57) PYGLPYGMRIPK1MAPT
SCHEMBL11959858 0.82 PYGL (0.69) PYGLPYGMRIPK1
SCHEMBL8916097 0.82 PYGL (0.69) PYGLPYGMRIPK1
SCHEMBL4390484 0.82 PYGL (0.46) PYGLPYGM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20240025856-A1 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF THE YAP/TAZ-TEAD ACTIVATION FOR TREATING CANCER CISTIM LEUVEN VZW (BE) 2024-01-25 US disclosed
US-20230278962-A1 Tetrahydrobenzoazepinones and Related Analogs for Inhibiting YAP/TAZ-TEAD KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN (BE) 2023-09-07 US disclosed
EP-4222143-A1 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF THE YAP/TAZ-TEAD ACTIVATION FOR TREATING CANCER Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (BE) 2023-08-09 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20240025856-A1 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF THE YAP/TAZ-TEAD ACTIVATION FOR TREATING CANCER YAP1, TEAD2, TEAD1 PYGL 449/4885PYGM 2161/4885RIPK1 1424/4885
US-20230278962-A1 Tetrahydrobenzoazepinones and Related Analogs for Inhibiting YAP/TAZ-TEAD YAP1, TEAD2, TEAD4 PYGL 614/4885PYGM 2664/4885RIPK1 1336/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.