SCHEMBL2533142

SCHEMBL2533142

O=C(Nc1nc2ccc(Sc3cnc4ccccn34)cc2s1)C1CC1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.51
SENP8 Q96LD8 1/20 0.51
SENP7 Q9BQF6 1/20 0.51
SENP6 Q9GZR1 1/20 0.51
ABL1 P00519 9/20 0.50
MET P08581 1/20 0.49
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.48
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.48
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.47
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.47
GFER P55789 1/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.46
LCK P06239 2/20 0.46
DYRK1A Q13627 1/20 0.46
KIT P10721 1/20 0.45
PDGFRA P16234 1/20 0.45
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1841257 0.86 CASP3 (0.50) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2534684 0.84 MET (0.60) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2530711 0.82 MET (0.61) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2529642 0.82 MET (0.54) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2542571 0.81 ABL1 (0.56) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL1838470 0.81 CASP3 (0.45) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2533133 0.81 NPC1 (0.51) SENP7ABL1NPC1RAB9AMEN1
SCHEMBL2534423 0.81 MET (0.49) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL1839889 0.80 MET (0.51) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL2536920 0.80 ABL1 (0.52) ABL1METKITPDGFRA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110257171-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-A]PYRIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-20 US claimed
US-20110257171-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-A]PYRIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110257171-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-A]PYRIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS MET, ALK, RET CASP3 3658/4885SENP8 4050/4885SENP7 4344/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.