SCHEMBL2540752

SCHEMBL2540752

COCCN1CCN(CC(=O)Nc2nc3ccc(Sc4cnc5ncccn45)cc3s2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.49
POLB P06746 1/20 0.49
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.48
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.48
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.48
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.46
CLK1 P49759 1/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.46
HTT P42858 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1836576 0.92 ALDH1A1 (0.55) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2544871 0.91 CLK1 (0.47) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2546870 0.90 SMN1; SMN2 (0.48) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2543867 0.90 CLK1 (0.58) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2545660 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.52) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2543183 0.89 CLK1 (0.48) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2541325 0.88 CLK1 (0.47) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2547147 0.88 CLK1 (0.56) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2543728 0.88 CLK1 (0.47) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA
SCHEMBL2546284 0.88 ALDH1A1 (0.42) ALDH1A1POLBSMN1; SMN2USP2LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS TPMT, MET, PAICS ALDH1A1 250/4885POLB 1483/4885SMN1; SMN2 2888/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.