SCHEMBL25645430

SCHEMBL25645430

C=CN1C(=O)S/C(=C/c2ccc(CC)cc2)C1=O

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MYC P01106 7/20 0.59
▸ MAX P61244 6/20 0.59
▸ IGF1R P08069 1/20 0.52
▸ PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.52
▸ PIM2 Q9P1W9 1/20 0.52
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.48
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.48
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.45
▸ KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.45
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.45
▸ AURKA O14965 2/20 0.44
▸ CISD1 Q9NZ45 3/20 0.44
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.43
▸ KDR P35968 1/20 0.43
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.43
▸ PSMD14 O00487 1/20 0.42
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17934519 0.81 MYC (0.63) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL17934604 0.77 MYC (0.59) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL25645369 0.76 MYC (0.68) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL17927322 0.75 MAPK1 (0.71) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL17927320 0.75 MAPK1 (0.71) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL20816069 0.74 MYC (1.00) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL20816068 0.74 MYC (1.00) MYCMAXIGF1RPIM1PIM2
SCHEMBL20816065 0.73 MYC (1.00) MYCMAXRAB9ASMN1; SMN2KMT2A
SCHEMBL20816067 0.73 MYC (1.00) MYCMAXRAB9ASMN1; SMN2KMT2A
SCHEMBL17051283 0.71 MYC (0.76) MYCMAXNPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230190961-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING MYELIN DEFICIENCY BY REJUVENATING GLIAL PROGENITOR CELLS UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER 2023-06-22 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230190961-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING MYELIN DEFICIENCY BY REJUVENATING GLIAL PROGENITOR CELLS TEAD2, MYT1, TEAD1 MYC 32/4885MAX 2012/4885IGF1R 4674/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback