SCHEMBL25901467

SCHEMBL25901467

C=C1CNC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc2ccc(O)cc2)NC(=O)[C@@H]2CCCN12

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ TERF2 Q15554 4/20 0.48
▸ GHSR Q92847 2/20 0.42
▸ HDAC4 P56524 2/20 0.42
▸ HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC7 Q8WUI4 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC10 Q969S8 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC11 Q96DB2 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC9 Q9UKV0 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC5 Q9UQL6 1/20 0.42
▸ NTSR1 P30989 4/20 0.41
▸ KLK7 P49862 1/20 0.40
▸ FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21430295 0.82 TERF2 (0.47) TERF2GHSRHDAC4HDAC3HDAC1
SCHEMBL30576705 0.81 HDAC3 (0.49) HDAC4HDAC3HDAC1HDAC7HDAC2
SCHEMBL21430287 0.81 HDAC3 (0.48) GHSRHDAC4HDAC3HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL22928930 0.81 HDAC3 (0.48) GHSRHDAC4HDAC3HDAC1HDAC2
Cyclomontanin D SCHEMBL30139332 0.80 SLC6A3 (0.54) TERF2HDAC4HDAC3HDAC1HDAC7
SCHEMBL29412929 0.78 HDAC4 (0.54) GHSRHDAC4
SCHEMBL21430233 0.78 TERF2 (0.41) TERF2GHSRHDAC4HDAC3HDAC1
SCHEMBL22929005 0.78 TERF2 (0.41) TERF2GHSRHDAC4HDAC3HDAC1
SCHEMBL1519049 0.77 ITGAV (0.47) TERF2GHSRHDAC4NTSR1
SCHEMBL29352662 0.76 HDAC8 (0.49) HDAC4HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11713339-B2 Macrocyclization of peptidomimetics UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK (GB) 2023-08-01 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-11713339-B2 Macrocyclization of peptidomimetics NGLY1, MAX, PTMA TERF2 1137/4885GHSR 190/4885HDAC4 2873/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback