SCHEMBL26044686

SCHEMBL26044686

Cc1ccc(-c2ccc(Br)cc2)c(OCc2ccccc2)n1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.46
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.43
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.43
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.43
SQOR Q9Y6N5 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
CNR1 P21554 6/20 0.41
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
PDE5A O76074 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25819126 0.87 L3MBTL1 (0.47) L3MBTL1MAPTSQORLMNACNR1
SCHEMBL26043793 0.86 MAPT (0.47) L3MBTL1MAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2SQOR
SCHEMBL26043794 0.86 L3MBTL1 (0.46) L3MBTL1SQORCNR1PDE5A
SCHEMBL25935014 0.85 GABRG2 (0.49) MEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1SQORCNR1
SCHEMBL25819183 0.85 AR (0.44) MEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1SQORCNR1
SCHEMBL23983264 0.84 GRM5 (0.43) L3MBTL1SQORLMNACNR1MCL1
SCHEMBL29681838 0.84 GRM5 (0.43) L3MBTL1SQORLMNACNR1MCL1
SCHEMBL25819597 0.82 L3MBTL1 (0.42) MEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1SQORCNR1
Formic Acid SCHEMBL29197680 0.81 MCL1 (0.42) SQORLMNACNR1MCL1
SCHEMBL25819197 0.80 L3MBTL1 (0.44) MEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1NPC1MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230265116-A1 DEGRADATION OF (EGFR) BY CONJUGATION OF EGFR INHIBITORS WITH E3 LIGASE LIGAND AND METHODS OF USE BEONE MEDICINES I GMBH (CH) 2023-08-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230265116-A1 DEGRADATION OF (EGFR) BY CONJUGATION OF EGFR INHIBITORS WITH E3 LIGASE LIGAND AND METHODS OF USE EGFR, CBL, ERBB2 MEN1 3601/4885KMT2A 2176/4885L3MBTL1 1119/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.