SCHEMBL2747170

SCHEMBL2747170

CNc1nccc(Oc2ccc3c(C(=O)Nc4cccc(C)c4)cccc3c2F)n1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 19/20 0.54
MET P08581 1/20 0.46
RET P07949 1/20 0.46
PDGFRA P16234 1/20 0.46
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.46
BRAF P15056 1/20 0.45
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.45
TNNI3K Q59H18 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2747025 0.90 KDR (0.55) KDRRETPDGFRAFLT1BRAF
SCHEMBL2747095 0.90 KDR (0.59) KDRMETRETPDGFRAFLT1
SCHEMBL2747385 0.88 KDR (0.57) KDRRETPDGFRAFLT1BRAF
SCHEMBL2749014 0.87 KDR (0.60) KDRMETRETPDGFRAFLT1
SCHEMBL4548719 0.84 KDR (0.55) KDRMETRETFLT1BRAF
SCHEMBL2747258 0.83 KDR (0.58) KDRFLT1BRAFMAPK14TNNI3K
SCHEMBL2748268 0.83 KDR (0.46) KDRMETBRAFMAPK14TNNI3K
SCHEMBL2748330 0.83 KDR (0.77) KDRRETPDGFRAFLT1
SCHEMBL4549004 0.78 KDR (0.78) KDRMETPDGFRAFLT1BRAF
SCHEMBL2747319 0.76 KDR (0.75) KDRRETPDGFRAFLT1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885MET 3/4885RET 138/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885MET 3/4885RET 138/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.