SCHEMBL2747397

SCHEMBL2747397

COc1cc2c(Oc3ccc4c(C(=O)Nc5cccc(Cl)c5)cccc4c3)ccnc2cc1OCCCN1CCOCC1

nearest known ligand 0.75

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 19/20 0.75
MET P08581 2/20 0.65
AURKA O14965 2/20 0.65
LCK P06239 2/20 0.65
TEK Q02763 2/20 0.65
CSF1R P07333 1/20 0.65
BRAF P15056 1/20 0.65
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.65
FGFR2 P21802 1/20 0.65
FLT4 P35916 1/20 0.65
AURKB Q96GD4 1/20 0.65
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.60
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.60
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.58

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4548697 0.93 FLT3 (0.68) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL14018164 0.92 KDR (0.63) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4548708 0.91 KDR (0.67) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4548693 0.90 KDR (0.76) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4548703 0.89 KDR (0.77) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4548694 0.89 KDR (0.75) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4549008 0.88 KDR (0.65) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL2748142 0.87 KDR (0.65) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL2748792 0.87 KDR (0.60) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK
SCHEMBL4548843 0.87 KDR (1.00) KDRMETAURKALCKTEK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885MET 3/4885AURKA 4148/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885MET 3/4885AURKA 4148/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.