SCHEMBL2747546

SCHEMBL2747546

COc1cc2ncc(F)c(Oc3ccc4c(C(=O)NC5CC5)cccc4c3)c2cc1OC

nearest known ligand 0.72

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 20/20 0.72
AURKA O14965 15/20 0.72
TEK Q02763 15/20 0.72
MET P08581 14/20 0.72
LCK P06239 11/20 0.72
AURKB Q96GD4 10/20 0.72
LYN P07948 2/20 0.72
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.72
FGR P09769 1/20 0.72
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2746840 0.85 KDR (0.72) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL2748191 0.85 KDR (0.73) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL2746021 0.84 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL4549035 0.83 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL2749701 0.83 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL4548744 0.83 KDR (0.79) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL2747309 0.81 KDR (0.76) KDRFLT1
SCHEMBL4548847 0.81 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL4548845 0.81 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK
SCHEMBL2748045 0.80 KDR (0.75) KDRAURKATEKMETLCK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885AURKA 4148/4885TEK 184/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885AURKA 4148/4885TEK 184/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.