SCHEMBL2748303

SCHEMBL2748303

COc1cc2nccc(Oc3ccc4c(C(=O)NC5CC5)ccnc4c3)c2cc1OC

nearest known ligand 0.81

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KDR P35968 17/20 0.81
▸ AURKA O14965 14/20 0.81
▸ MET P08581 14/20 0.81
▸ TEK Q02763 14/20 0.81
▸ LCK P06239 11/20 0.81
▸ AURKB Q96GD4 10/20 0.81
▸ ABL1 P00519 2/20 0.81
▸ LYN P07948 2/20 0.81
▸ FGR P09769 1/20 0.81
▸ KIT P10721 2/20 0.61
▸ PDGFRA P16234 2/20 0.61
▸ AXL P30530 1/20 0.60
▸ FLT1 P17948 2/20 0.59
▸ RIPK2 O43353 1/20 0.59
▸ ERN1 O75460 1/20 0.59
▸ STK10 O94804 1/20 0.59
▸ MAP3K6 O95382 1/20 0.59
▸ ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.59
▸ RET P07949 1/20 0.59
▸ PDGFRB P09619 1/20 0.59

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2746021 0.89 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL4549050 0.86 KDR (0.69) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL4548847 0.86 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL4548845 0.86 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL4549058 0.85 KDR (0.77) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL4548830 0.84 KDR (0.88) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL2747467 0.84 KDR (0.81) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL2747204 0.83 KDR (0.71) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL2747381 0.82 KDR (0.67) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK
SCHEMBL2747800 0.82 KDR (1.00) KDRAURKAMETTEKLCK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 16 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
JP-2007518824-A — — 2007-07-12 — — JP claimed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 — — US claimed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 — — EP claimed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 — — WO claimed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 — — US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 — — US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 — — US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 — — US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 — — US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 — — US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 — — US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 — — US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 — — US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 — — US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 — — EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885AURKA 4148/4885MET 3/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885AURKA 4148/4885MET 3/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback