SCHEMBL2748623

SCHEMBL2748623

CNC(=O)c1cc(Oc2ccc3c(C(=O)Nc4ccc(OC)cc4)cccc3c2)ccn1

nearest known ligand 0.84

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 16/20 0.84
FGFR1 P11362 1/20 0.58
BRAF P15056 2/20 0.58
MET P08581 3/20 0.57
AURKA O14965 2/20 0.57
LCK P06239 2/20 0.57
TEK Q02763 2/20 0.57
AURKB Q96GD4 2/20 0.57
CSF1R P07333 1/20 0.57
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.57
FGFR2 P21802 1/20 0.57
FLT4 P35916 1/20 0.57
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.57
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.57

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2747607 0.93 KDR (0.76) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2747497 0.92 KDR (0.75) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2748756 0.92 KDR (0.84) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2746993 0.92 KDR (0.84) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETFLT1
SCHEMBL2748546 0.91 KDR (0.82) KDRFGFR1BRAFMET
SCHEMBL2747600 0.91 KDR (1.00) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2747925 0.91 KDR (0.82) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2747688 0.90 KDR (0.80) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2747900 0.89 KDR (0.78) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA
SCHEMBL2747491 0.89 KDR (0.78) KDRFGFR1BRAFMETAURKA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885FGFR1 9/4885BRAF 170/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885FGFR1 9/4885BRAF 170/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.