SCHEMBL2863129

SCHEMBL2863129

COc1cc2c(Oc3ccc(-c4cnc(Nc5ccc(Cl)cc5)n(C)c4=O)cc3F)ccnc2cc1OCCCN1CCOCC1

nearest known ligand 0.90

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 17/20 0.90
MST1R Q04912 5/20 0.90
KDR P35968 4/20 0.90
HGF P14210 3/20 0.90
RPS6KB1 P23443 3/20 0.90
TEK Q02763 3/20 0.90
BTK Q06187 3/20 0.90
EGFR P00533 2/20 0.90
FLT4 P35916 2/20 0.90
JAK2 O60674 1/20 0.90
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.90
FGFR2 P21802 1/20 0.90
AURKA O14965 2/20 0.70
LCK P06239 2/20 0.70
CSF1R P07333 1/20 0.70
RPS6KA5 O75582 1/20 0.70
PIM1 P11309 1/20 0.70
MAPK9 P45984 1/20 0.70
AXL P30530 3/20 0.61

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2868963 0.95 MET (1.00) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL29439859 0.95 MET (1.00) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL2868521 0.94 MET (0.91) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL13511860 0.94 MET (0.91) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL2869076 0.94 MET (1.00) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL2861831 0.93 MET (0.88) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL15404552 0.89 MET (0.71) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL2861036 0.88 MET (0.80) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL3913569 0.87 MET (0.79) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1
SCHEMBL3920694 0.87 MET (0.87) METMST1RKDRHGFRPS6KB1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1827434-B1 QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER AMGEN INC (US) 2014-01-15 EP claimed
EP-1827434-A2 QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER Amgen Inc. (US) 2007-09-05 EP claimed
US-20060252777-A1 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-11-09 US claimed
WO-2006060318-A2 QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-06-08 WO claimed
EP-1827434-B1 QUINOLINES AND QUINAZOLINE ANALOGS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTS FOR TREATING CANCER AMGEN INC (US) 2014-01-15 EP disclosed
US-7652009-B2 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use AMGEM INC. (US) 2010-01-26 US disclosed
US-7652009-B2 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use AMGEM INC. (US) 2010-01-26 US disclosed
US-7652009-B2 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use AMGEM INC. (US) 2010-01-26 US disclosed
US-20060252777-A1 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-11-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060252777-A1 Substituted heterocycles and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET MET 3/4885MST1R 815/4885KDR 231/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.