SCHEMBL2884191

SCHEMBL2884191

CCC(C)(C)P(c1ccc(P(C(C)(C)CC)C(C)(C)CC)cc1)C(C)(C)CC

nearest known ligand 0.32

Predicted protein targets (top 3)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KCNN4 O15554 1/20 0.31
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.30
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2884978 0.91 HTR2A (0.39) TSHRTDP1
SCHEMBL2544920 0.91 TSHR (0.37) TSHRTDP1
SCHEMBL2545629 0.90 CYP3A4 (0.39) KCNN4TSHRTDP1
SCHEMBL2884648 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.35) TDP1
SCHEMBL2547208 0.89 KDM4E (0.36) TDP1
SCHEMBL2544647 0.89 TSHR (0.41) TSHR
SCHEMBL2550095 0.85 CA1 (0.44) TSHRTDP1
SCHEMBL3817848 0.85 ALDH1A1 (0.39) TSHR
SCHEMBL2554997 0.82 GABRA1 (0.31)
SCHEMBL18963569 0.80 KDM4E (0.34) TDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2552928-B1 A PROCESS FOR THE REDUCTION OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE TO THE CORRESPONDING TERTIARY PHOSPHINE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST AND USE OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE FOR REDUCING A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST. CHROMAFORA AB (SE) 2015-04-15 EP disclosed
US-8735629-B2 Process for the reduction of a tertiary phosphine oxide to the corresponding tertiary phosphine in the presence of a catalyst and use of a tertiary phosphine for reducing a tertiary phosphine oxide in the presence of a catalyst CHROMAFORA AB (SE) 2014-05-27 US disclosed
US-8426647-B2 2013-04-23 US disclosed
US-20130012725-A1 PROCESS FOR THE REDUCTION OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE TO THE CORRESPONDING TERTIARY PHOSPHINE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST AND USE OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE FOR REDUCING A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST CHROMAFORA AB (SE) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
US-7847126-B2 prepared by reacting phosphorus halide with organomagnesium compound in presence of copper compound; di(tert-butyl)phenylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate, for example LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH (DE) 2010-12-07 US disclosed
US-20070299273-A1 prepared by reacting phosphorus halide with organomagnesium compound in presence of copper compound; di(tert-butyl)phenylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate, for example LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH (DE) 2007-12-27 US disclosed
US-7230136-B2 Reacting phosphorus halide with organomagnesium compound in presence of copper compound LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH (DE) 2007-06-12 US disclosed
US-20030229240-A1 Reacting phosphorus halide with organomagnesium compound in presence of copper compound LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH (DE) 2003-12-11 US disclosed
EP-1354886-A1 Process for the preparation of tertiary phosphines Bayer Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2003-10-22 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130012725-A1 PROCESS FOR THE REDUCTION OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE TO THE CORRESPONDING TERTIARY PHOSPHINE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST AND USE OF A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE FOR REDUCING A TERTIARY PHOSPHINE OXIDE IN THE PRESENCE OF A CATALYST PSPH, PNPO, PHOSPHO1 KCNN4 3100/4885TSHR 1485/4885TDP1 1944/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.