SCHEMBL29561758

SCHEMBL29561758

CSCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(=O)O)C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(=O)O)C(=O)O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ VIPR2 P41587 7/20 0.50
▸ GLP1R P43220 2/20 0.50
▸ GCGR P47871 1/20 0.50
▸ GIPR P48546 1/20 0.50
▸ VIPR1 P32241 5/20 0.48
▸ BACE1 P56817 3/20 0.45
▸ RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.44
▸ CCKBR P32239 1/20 0.43
▸ PTH1R Q03431 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30262014 0.91 RXFP1 (0.47) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL30512750 0.91 GLP1R (0.46) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL31157682 0.90 VIPR2 (0.43) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL30140929 0.90 BACE1 (0.49) GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1BACE1
SCHEMBL31157765 0.89 PTPN1 (0.41) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL29453337 0.89 VIPR2 (0.54) VIPR2VIPR1BACE1
SCHEMBL29742723 0.89 VIPR2 (0.49) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL31689336 0.89 BACE1 (0.45) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL31157748 0.89 IL23R (0.45) VIPR2GLP1RGCGRGIPRVIPR1
SCHEMBL29453350 0.88 VIPR2 (0.54) VIPR2VIPR1BACE1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20220112510-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITION FOR TRANSFERRING T-DNA INTO A PLANT PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2022-04-14 — — US claimed
US-12509696-B2 Methods and composition for transferring T-DNA into a plant PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2025-12-30 — — US disclosed
US-20240263186-A1 EXPRESSION CONSTRUCTS, VIRD2 MUTANT AGROBACTERIUM STRAINS, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2024-08-08 — — US disclosed
US-20220112510-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITION FOR TRANSFERRING T-DNA INTO A PLANT PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2022-04-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-12509696-B2 Methods and composition for transferring T-DNA into a plant AMPD2, MYB, TOMM22 VIPR2 668/4885GLP1R 3909/4885GCGR 4592/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback