SCHEMBL29591975

SCHEMBL29591975

N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1c[nH]cn1)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1c[nH]cn1)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)Cc1c[nH]cn1)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ APLNR P35414 4/20 0.51
▸ CTSL P07711 3/20 0.50
▸ CTSS P25774 3/20 0.50
▸ CTSK P43235 3/20 0.50
▸ CTSH P09668 1/20 0.50
▸ C5AR1 P21730 1/20 0.50
▸ MC4R P32245 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29630628 0.99 APLNR (0.49) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL29607754 0.92 APLNR (0.56) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL29606819 0.91 APLNR (0.57) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL29607035 0.91 APLNR (0.55) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL29607506 0.91 APLNR (0.56) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL31683844 0.89 APLNR (0.46) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL31290257 0.89 MC4R (0.55) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL30442638 0.89 F2 (0.51) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH
SCHEMBL29608384 0.89 APLNR (0.56) APLNRC5AR1MC4R
SCHEMBL30339898 0.88 CTSL (0.53) APLNRCTSLCTSSCTSKCTSH

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-12618102-B2 Biochemical reaction methods and reagents comprising intrinsically disordered regions Biocrucible Limited (GB) 2026-05-05 — — US disclosed
US-20220112547-A1 BIOCHEMICAL REACTION METHODS AND REAGENTS COMPRISING INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED REGIONS Biocrucible Limited (GB) 2022-04-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-12618102-B2 Biochemical reaction methods and reagents comprising intrinsically disordered regions POLM, POLR1A, POLR1E APLNR 934/4885CTSL 1435/4885CTSS 2894/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback