SCHEMBL3011202

SCHEMBL3011202

O=S(=O)(c1c(F)cccc1F)N1CCN(c2nc(-c3cc(F)cc(F)c3)cs2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.60
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.60
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.60
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.58
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.58
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.58
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.58
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.56
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.56
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.56
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.56
PKM P14618 8/20 0.51
PKLR P30613 3/20 0.51
AR P10275 3/20 0.50
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.44
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.43
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.43
GAA P10253 1/20 0.43
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3006323 0.93 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3014017 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3008047 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3005812 0.89 LMNA (0.67) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3012611 0.88 ALDH1A1 (0.59) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL2999100 0.87 SMN1; SMN2 (0.61) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3013178 0.86 MAPT (0.67) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3012759 0.86 SMN1; SMN2 (0.57) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3023519 0.86 MAPT (0.59) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL3017137 0.86 SMN1; SMN2 (0.57) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1KMT2ALMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2188272-B1 PHENYL- AND BENZYLTHIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES REMYND NV (BE) 2016-02-24 EP disclosed
US-8722681-B2 N-sulfonyl thiazolylpiperazine derivatives and related N-sulfonyl heterocyclic derivatives for the treatment of neuro degenerative diseases NV REMYND (BE) 2014-05-13 US disclosed
US-20100197703-A1 N-SULFONYL THIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED N-SULFONYL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURO DEGENERATIVE DISEASES NV REMYND (BE) 2010-08-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100197703-A1 N-SULFONYL THIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED N-SULFONYL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURO DEGENERATIVE DISEASES SMN1; SMN2, HTT, SNCA ALDH1A1 3510/4885SMN1; SMN2 1/4885L3MBTL1 1847/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.