SCHEMBL3047633

SCHEMBL3047633

CC1(C)CCC(NCc2ccc(-c3ccc4[nH]cnc4c3)c(F)c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KCNH2 Q12809 5/20 0.37
ALOX5AP P20292 5/20 0.37
FEN1 P39748 5/20 0.37
CHEK1 O14757 4/20 0.35
WDR5 P61964 2/20 0.35
BMPR1B O00238 1/20 0.35
BMPR1A P36894 1/20 0.35
TGFBR1 P36897 1/20 0.35
ACVRL1 P37023 1/20 0.35
ACVR1 Q04771 1/20 0.35
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.34
QPCT Q16769 1/20 0.34
GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.34
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.33
CXCR4 P61073 1/20 0.33
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.32
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.32
TMEM97 Q5BJF2 1/20 0.32
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3043897 0.99 KCNH2 (0.36) KCNH2ALOX5APFEN1CHEK1WDR5
SCHEMBL13137127 0.89 CHEK1 (0.35) KCNH2CHEK1BMPR1BBMPR1ATGFBR1
SCHEMBL13137267 0.89 DHODH (0.33) KCNH2WDR5CYP2D6QPCTGRIN2B
SCHEMBL13137153 0.88 CHEK1 (0.35) KCNH2CHEK1BMPR1BBMPR1ATGFBR1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3048045 0.88 CHEK1 (0.34) KCNH2CHEK1BMPR1BBMPR1ATGFBR1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3047469 0.88 DHODH (0.33) KCNH2WDR5CYP2D6QPCTGRIN2B
SCHEMBL13137172 0.87 BACE1 (0.36) KCNH2ALOX5APFEN1WDR5QPCT
SCHEMBL3047798 0.87 HRH3 (0.42) CYP2D6QPCTCYP3A4CXCR4
SCHEMBL13137196 0.86 QPCT (0.36) KCNH2ALOX5APFEN1CHEK1CYP2D6
SCHEMBL13137235 0.85 PDGFRB (0.36) KCNH2CHEK1CYP2D6QPCTCYP3A4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-09-02 US claimed
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-09-02 US disclosed
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-09-02 US disclosed
WO-2008021851-A2 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2008-02-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 KCNH2 909/4885ALOX5AP 964/4885FEN1 4876/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.