SCHEMBL3311233

SCHEMBL3311233

Cc1nnc(OCC(F)(F)F)c(-c2c(F)cc(F)cc2F)c1-c1ccc(Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTT P42858 1/20 0.35
SGK1 O00141 3/20 0.35
MAT2A P31153 1/20 0.34
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.33
SCN5A Q14524 1/20 0.33
SCN2A Q99250 1/20 0.33
SCN10A Q9Y5Y9 1/20 0.33
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.33
PSD A5PKW4 2/20 0.33
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 3/20 0.33
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.32
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.32
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.32
ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.32
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.32
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.32
ACLY P53396 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3307467 0.91 SGK1 (0.35) SGK1PTGS2
SCHEMBL3311725 0.84 KDM4E (0.37) HTTSGK1MAT2AKCNH2SCN5A
SCHEMBL2355414 0.83 MEN1 (0.47) MEN1KMT2ACNR1PSDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3971627 0.81 RAB9A (0.39) HTTMEN1KMT2APSDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3313721 0.78 RAB9A (0.37) HTTMEN1KMT2APSDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3310669 0.77 KDM4E (0.37) SGK1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL1869939 0.77 RAB9A (0.36) HTTMEN1KMT2APSDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL14010474 0.74 RAB9A (0.36) HTTMEN1KMT2APSDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL12394014 0.74 MEN1 (0.49) MEN1KMT2ACNR1MAPTTP53
SCHEMBL12457752 0.74 MEN1 (0.37) MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2MAPTTP53

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100113457-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-05-06 US claimed
EP-2121629-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2009-11-25 EP claimed
WO-2008049584-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-05-02 WO claimed
US-20100113457-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-05-06 US disclosed
EP-2121629-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2009-11-25 EP disclosed
WO-2008049584-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-05-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100113457-A1 NOVEL PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES C3AR1, C5, C1S HTT 3536/4885SGK1 4090/4885MAT2A 2896/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.