SCHEMBL3329620

SCHEMBL3329620

COc1cc2[nH]cnc(=O)c2cc1OCCCCl

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PDE3B Q13370 2/20 0.40
PDE3A Q14432 2/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.38
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.37
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.37
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.37
ENPP1 P22413 1/20 0.36
SRC P12931 1/20 0.36
GRIN2D O15399 1/20 0.36
GRIN3B O60391 1/20 0.36
GRIN1 Q05586 1/20 0.36
GRIN2A Q12879 1/20 0.36
GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.36
GRIN2C Q14957 1/20 0.36
GRIN3A Q8TCU5 1/20 0.36
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.35
CTSV O60911 2/20 0.35
CTSL P07711 2/20 0.35
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4376396 1.00 PDE3B (0.40) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4375766 0.96 PDE3B (0.39) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4377096 0.95 KDM4E (0.38) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4297391 0.88 PRKAB2 (0.42) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2002754 0.87 KDM4E (0.46) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1806456 0.85 PDE3B (0.47) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL5495216 0.84 KDM4E (0.41) KDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1HPGDSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1507501 0.83 PDE3B (0.43) PDE3BPDE3AKDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL263796 0.83 EGFR (0.39) KDM4EMAPK1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4373778 0.81 EHMT2 (0.52) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDKMT2AHSD17B10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 11 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1477481-B1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING QUINAZOLIN-4-ONE DERIVATIVE UBE INDUSTRIES (JP) 2009-07-22 EP claimed
US-20050080262-A1 Process for producing quinazolin-4-one derivative UBE INDUSTRIES, LTD. (JP) 2005-04-14 US claimed
EP-1477481-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING QUINAZOLIN-4-ONE DERIVATIVE Ube Industries, Ltd. (JP) 2004-11-17 EP claimed
US-8367824-B2 Reacting anthranilic acid with formic acid compound in presence of a catalyst and solvent UBE INDUSTRIES LTD. (JP) 2013-02-05 US disclosed
US-8350029-B2 Process for the preparation of gefitinib CIPLA LIMITED (IN) 2013-01-08 US disclosed
US-20100137586-A1 Process for the Preparation of Gefitinib CIPLA LIMITED (IN) 2010-06-03 US disclosed
EP-2155656-A2 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF GEFITINIB Cipla Limited (IN) 2010-02-24 EP disclosed
EP-1477481-B1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING QUINAZOLIN-4-ONE DERIVATIVE UBE INDUSTRIES (JP) 2009-07-22 EP disclosed
WO-2008125867-A2 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF GEFITINIB CIPLA LIMITED (IN) 2008-10-23 WO disclosed
US-20050080262-A1 Process for producing quinazolin-4-one derivative UBE INDUSTRIES, LTD. (JP) 2005-04-14 US disclosed
EP-1477481-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING QUINAZOLIN-4-ONE DERIVATIVE Ube Industries, Ltd. (JP) 2004-11-17 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100137586-A1 Process for the Preparation of Gefitinib EGFR, BRAF, KRAS PDE3B 1795/4885PDE3A 2218/4885KDM4E 1987/4885
US-20050080262-A1 Process for producing quinazolin-4-one derivative NQO2, SDHA, CYP3A4 PDE3B 3161/4885PDE3A 2770/4885KDM4E 879/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.