Ammonia Solution, Strong

Ammonia Solution, Strong

SCHEMBL3445835

N.N.O=C(O)C(CC(O)(Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)C(=O)O)=NO

nearest known ligand 0.48

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.48
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.48
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.43
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.43
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.42
APAF1 O14727 1/20 0.42
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.42
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.42
MPO P05164 1/20 0.42
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.42
BLM P54132 1/20 0.42
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.42
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL560495 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL4811413 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL4811403 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL4811423 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL560400 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL560398 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL560399 1.00 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL13844616 0.99 KMT2A (0.49) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL560222 0.99 KMT2A (0.49) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL559736 0.99 KMT2A (0.49) KMT2AMEN1MAPTKDM4ESMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7816541-B2 Process for producing an optically active compound AJINOMOTO CO., INC. (JP) 2010-10-19 US disclosed
US-20080207920-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUND AJINOMOTO CO., INC. (JP) 2008-08-28 US disclosed
EP-1956003-A2 Process for producing an optically active compound Ajinomoto Co., Inc. (JP) 2008-08-13 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080207920-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUND AADAT, ALDOA, ALAD KMT2A 2106/4885MEN1 1204/4885MAPT 622/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.