SCHEMBL3523846

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

	Compound	similarity	top predicted	shared targets
	SCHEMBL3519075	0.89	FFAR1 (0.76)	FFAR1
	SCHEMBL3523242	0.89	FFAR1 (0.76)	FFAR1
	SCHEMBL3518778	0.89	FFAR1 (0.76)	FFAR1
	SCHEMBL3521002	0.88	FFAR1 (0.74)	FFAR1
	SCHEMBL5247573	0.87	FFAR1 (0.60)	FFAR1MAOB
	SCHEMBL3521007	0.87	FFAR1 (0.60)	FFAR1MAOB
	SCHEMBL3523644	0.87	FFAR1 (0.60)	FFAR1MAOB
	SCHEMBL13118028	0.87	FFAR1 (0.60)	FFAR1MAOB
	SCHEMBL13118044	0.86	FFAR1 (0.59)	FFAR1MAOB
	SCHEMBL13140288	0.83	FFAR1 (0.53)	FFAR1MAOB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 15 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.