SCHEMBL3597910

SCHEMBL3597910

COc1cc(C(=O)c2c(-c3ccccc3)c(OC)c3ccccn23)ccc1N

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 9/20 0.47
TUBB4A P04350 3/20 0.43
TUBB P07437 3/20 0.43
TUBA3C P0DPH7 3/20 0.43
TUBA1B P68363 3/20 0.43
TUBA4A P68366 3/20 0.43
TUBB4B P68371 3/20 0.43
TUBB3 Q13509 3/20 0.43
TUBB2A Q13885 3/20 0.43
TUBB8 Q3ZCM7 3/20 0.43
TUBA3E Q6PEY2 3/20 0.43
TUBA1A Q71U36 3/20 0.43
TUBA1C Q9BQE3 3/20 0.43
TUBB6 Q9BUF5 3/20 0.43
TUBB2B Q9BVA1 3/20 0.43
TUBB1 Q9H4B7 3/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL322335 0.87 MAPT (0.45) MAPTSMN1; SMN2TP53
SCHEMBL2519397 0.86 NPC1 (0.46) MAPTTUBB4ATUBBTUBA3CTUBA1B
SCHEMBL1573132 0.83 MAPT (0.40) MAPTTP53GAA
SCHEMBL3602590 0.82 NPC1 (0.40) MAPTNPC1GAAATMRXFP1
SCHEMBL6220257 0.82 HTT (0.43) MAPTTUBB4ATUBBTUBA3CTUBA1B
SCHEMBL1572852 0.81 MAPT (0.42) MAPTSMN1; SMN2TP53
SCHEMBL11186148 0.81 MAPT (0.41) MAPTTP53
SCHEMBL3944999 0.81 MAPT (0.57) MAPTSMN1; SMN2TP53GAA
SCHEMBL4521306 0.80 MAPT (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2TP53GAA
SCHEMBL1572805 0.80 MAPT (0.47) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1GAAATM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7803811-B2 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of FGFs, method for preparing them and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2010-09-28 US disclosed
US-20090023770-A1 Novel 1,2,3-Substituted Indolizine Derivatives, Inhibitors of FGFs, Method for Preparing Them and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Them SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2009-01-22 US disclosed
US-7442708-B2 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2008-10-28 US disclosed
US-20050203126-A1 Novel 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same SANOFI (FR) 2005-09-15 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050203126-A1 Novel 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same FGFR3, FGFR1, NTRK3 MAPT 4109/4885TUBB4A 2898/4885TUBB 2622/4885
US-20090023770-A1 Novel 1,2,3-Substituted Indolizine Derivatives, Inhibitors of FGFs, Method for Preparing Them and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Them FGF2, FGF1, FGFR1 MAPT 2866/4885TUBB4A 1990/4885TUBB 2231/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.