SCHEMBL3667060

SCHEMBL3667060

CCC(CC)n1c(O)nc2ncc(Cl)c(C=NOCc3ccccc3)c21

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GAA P10253 2/20 0.37
RET P07949 1/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.33
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.33
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.32
ADRA2B P18089 1/20 0.32
ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.32
EGFR P00533 1/20 0.32
ERBB2 P04626 1/20 0.32
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.31
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.31
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.31
DRD1 P21728 1/20 0.31
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.31
DRD5 P21918 1/20 0.31
GRK2 P25098 1/20 0.31
GRK5 P34947 1/20 0.31
GRK3 P35626 1/20 0.31
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.31
BACE1 P56817 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3668455 1.00 GAA (0.37) GAARETALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2ADRA2A
SCHEMBL3667058 1.00 GAA (0.37) GAARETALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2ADRA2A
SCHEMBL3665451 0.84
SCHEMBL3665447 0.84
SCHEMBL3670757 0.84
SCHEMBL3667746 0.84
SCHEMBL3671322 0.84
SCHEMBL3672433 0.82 GAA (0.37) GAARETALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2DRD2
SCHEMBL3667059 0.82 GAA (0.37) GAARETALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2DRD2
SCHEMBL3667612 0.81

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7851484-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2010-12-14 US claimed
EP-2139478-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-01-06 EP claimed
WO-2008121333-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2008-10-09 WO claimed
US-20080242695-A1 Certain Chemical Entities, Compositions, and Methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2008-10-02 US claimed
US-7851484-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2010-12-14 US disclosed
EP-2139478-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-01-06 EP disclosed
WO-2008121333-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2008-10-09 WO disclosed
US-20080242695-A1 Certain Chemical Entities, Compositions, and Methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2008-10-02 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080242695-A1 Certain Chemical Entities, Compositions, and Methods TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 GAA 939/4885RET 936/4885ALDH1A1 4750/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.