Ammonia Solution, Strong

Ammonia Solution, Strong

SCHEMBL3689602

N.O=S(=O)(O)Oc1ccc(C=Cc2ccccc2)c(C=Cc2ccccc2)c1C=Cc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NFE2L2 Q16236 5/20 0.39
TRPA1 O75762 2/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.38
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.38
CYP1A1 P04798 2/20 0.38
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.38
CYP1B1 Q16678 2/20 0.38
CISD1 Q9NZ45 1/20 0.38
PELI1 Q96FA3 1/20 0.36
TUBB1 Q9H4B7 2/20 0.36
SLC22A6 Q4U2R8 1/20 0.36
TUBB4A P04350 1/20 0.35
TUBB P07437 1/20 0.35
TUBA3C P0DPH7 1/20 0.35
TUBA1B P68363 1/20 0.35
TUBA4A P68366 1/20 0.35
TUBB4B P68371 1/20 0.35
TUBB3 Q13509 1/20 0.35
TUBB2A Q13885 1/20 0.35
TUBB8 Q3ZCM7 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL374848 1.00 NFE2L2 (0.39) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
SCHEMBL334592 0.98 NFE2L2 (0.40) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
SCHEMBL334593 0.98 NFE2L2 (0.40) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
SCHEMBL29617519 0.98 NFE2L2 (0.40) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
Ether SCHEMBL2090104 0.91 CHAT (0.36) NFE2L2TRPA1PPARGCYP1A1CYP1A2
Ether SCHEMBL2161041 0.89 CHAT (0.37) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL2482264 0.88 NFE2L2 (0.46) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCISD1
Sulfuric Acid SCHEMBL2090106 0.86 NFE2L2 (0.40) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCYP1A1
SCHEMBL2231182 0.86 NFE2L2 (0.47) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCISD1
SCHEMBL30579740 0.86 NFE2L2 (0.47) NFE2L2TRPA1LMNAPPARGCISD1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2129223-B1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVE, CYPRODINIL AND AN UNSATURATED FATTY ACID SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2016-12-14 EP disclosed
US-20130178491-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC (US) 2013-07-11 US disclosed
US-20100113552-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-05-06 US disclosed
EP-2129223-A2 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVE, CYPRODINIL AND AN UNSATURATED FATTY ACID Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2009-12-09 EP disclosed
WO-2008119439-A2 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVE, CYPRODINIL AND AN UNSATURATED FATTY ACID SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-10-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100113552-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION CYCS, CYP1A2, CYP1A1 NFE2L2 820/4885TRPA1 3090/4885LMNA 1772/4885
US-20130178491-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION CYP1A2, CYCS, FFAR3 NFE2L2 826/4885TRPA1 2903/4885LMNA 1714/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.